@A_A to science • 11 months ago[meta] Lack of posting rules in /c/sciencemessage-square7arrow-up123arrow-down13file-text
arrow-up120arrow-down1message-square[meta] Lack of posting rules in /c/science@A_A to science • 11 months agomessage-square7file-text
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink6•11 months agoGood idea in principle. Do peer-reviewed journals only count as credible? If not, what is your proposed criteria?
minus-squarehauilinkfedilink2•11 months agoI mean, using peer teviewed journals and „credible“ in the same sentence these days is quite gutsy, ngl. Source: https://www.theguardian.com/science/2024/feb/03/the-situation-has-become-appalling-fake-scientific-papers-push-research-credibility-to-crisis-point
minus-square@A_AOPlink1•11 months agoI would accept any article which try at least to be educational and sustain science // not confuse people or sell snake oil.
Good idea in principle. Do peer-reviewed journals only count as credible? If not, what is your proposed criteria?
I mean, using peer teviewed journals and „credible“ in the same sentence these days is quite gutsy, ngl. Source: https://www.theguardian.com/science/2024/feb/03/the-situation-has-become-appalling-fake-scientific-papers-push-research-credibility-to-crisis-point
I would accept any article which try at least to be educational and sustain science // not confuse people or sell snake oil.