So I just discovered that I have been working next to the waste of oxygen that raped my best friend several years ago. I work in a manufacturing environment and I know that you can’t fire someone just for being a sex offender unless it directly interferes with work duties (in the US). But despite it being a primarily male workforce he does work with several women who have no idea what he is. He literally followed a woman home, broke into her house, and raped her. Him working here puts every female employee at risk. How is that not an unsafe working environment? How is it at even legal to employ him anywhere where he will have contact with women?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    68 months ago

    That does not mean he didn’t do it. You need a brush up on your 3rd grade reading comprehension.

      • @Holyginz
        link
        78 months ago

        He raped her, therefore he is a rapist. What are you not getting here

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        58 months ago

        Yes we do. He raped her. He is a rapist. OJ is a killer and trump is a rapist. Escaping justice does not mean you didn’t do it.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              3
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              THIS.

              All the rest of this conversation is pedantic nonsense (on both sides, I might add).

              It’s like if the law decided that only fire brick red as defined by this website is red : https://html-color.codes/red

              And then someone on lemmy said “the court said your car isn’t red”. And then we’d have to spend a half hour and an incredibly long post to explain how courts sometimes use different definitions for words that people use in normal conversation, and to be careful how you interpret that.

              Bottom line is Trump did what everyone else is calling rape.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            68 months ago

            That is false. Again. You keep saying the same thing and you keep being wrong. Not proving he’s a rapist does not means he not one. Please go back you school you complete dunce.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                28 months ago

                False. Again. Being unable to prove something true does not make that thing false. The ONLY reason it can’t be proven true is because of how long ago he did it.