So I just discovered that I have been working next to the waste of oxygen that raped my best friend several years ago. I work in a manufacturing environment and I know that you can’t fire someone just for being a sex offender unless it directly interferes with work duties (in the US). But despite it being a primarily male workforce he does work with several women who have no idea what he is. He literally followed a woman home, broke into her house, and raped her. Him working here puts every female employee at risk. How is that not an unsafe working environment? How is it at even legal to employ him anywhere where he will have contact with women?

    • @Holyginz
      link
      79 months ago

      He raped her, therefore he is a rapist. What are you not getting here

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      59 months ago

      Yes we do. He raped her. He is a rapist. OJ is a killer and trump is a rapist. Escaping justice does not mean you didn’t do it.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            3
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            THIS.

            All the rest of this conversation is pedantic nonsense (on both sides, I might add).

            It’s like if the law decided that only fire brick red as defined by this website is red : https://html-color.codes/red

            And then someone on lemmy said “the court said your car isn’t red”. And then we’d have to spend a half hour and an incredibly long post to explain how courts sometimes use different definitions for words that people use in normal conversation, and to be careful how you interpret that.

            Bottom line is Trump did what everyone else is calling rape.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          69 months ago

          That is false. Again. You keep saying the same thing and you keep being wrong. Not proving he’s a rapist does not means he not one. Please go back you school you complete dunce.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              29 months ago

              False. Again. Being unable to prove something true does not make that thing false. The ONLY reason it can’t be proven true is because of how long ago he did it.