• Flying SquidM
    link
    210 months ago

    Of course it is. Why would you expect different states to have different tipping policies? How would people remember what or whether to tip in each state?

    Believe it or not, non-union restaurant businesses, being the vast majority in the U.S., have a lot more clout than unions.

    • Saik0
      link
      fedilink
      English
      010 months ago

      How would people remember what or whether to tip in each state?

      The tip “laws” are indeed different per state… and the onus is put on the business owner as it should be.
      https://www.dol.gov/agencies/whd/state/minimum-wage/tipped

      The people you’re interacting with on this forum are more than likely from more populous states definitionally. If you look up those states, they likely make way more than the 2.13$ that you fear they do.

      • Flying SquidM
        link
        110 months ago

        I don’t remember fearing they make $2.13 an hour.

        I fear they don’t make what minimum wage should be at the very least- $15 an hour.

        • Saik0
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -110 months ago

          This country is wide and disparate. 15$ in NYC is not equivalent to 15$ in the middle of nowhere Utah.

          This is why states can choose to make minimum wage whatever they want. Simply blanket stating that 15$/hr for everyone is silly. But lets realize that many states DO require around 15$/hr (or close enough where a 1 dollar tip per table would net them 15 really easily)… and those states actually hold a significant portion of the population of the USA… meaning that most of the people you’re talking to here on Lemmy are LIKELY from those states. Does someone who lives in a house in the middle of nowhere Utah have the same requirements for income? You can look on zillow right now… There’s houses that appear fully functional for sale at $30,000 (357 results for less than 50k). Does that person need 15$/hr? Just because you’re used to prices where you live, and demand those wages at your location, doesn’t mean that those numbers make sense at other place in the USA.

          So the real question… Where you live… on the table… are they already close to 15$, or close enough that a 5-10% tip which is what used to be customary would still get them over your magical 15$/hr number?

          • Flying SquidM
            link
            210 months ago

            We have a federal minimum wage. Are you really not aware of that?

            And no, it is nowhere near $15 in Indiana.

            • Saik0
              link
              fedilink
              English
              110 months ago

              We have a federal minimum wage. Are you really not aware of that?

              Yes, which is completely superseded by the states minimum wage. Which is what I said in my post if you bothered to read. What about my post makes it seem like I don’t know that a federal minimum wage exists?

              And no, it is nowhere near $15 in Indiana.

              So looking at Zillow, there’s 358 houses in Indiana that are less than 50k to purchase (over 1000, at less than 100k)… Why do you need 15$/hr? What makes 15/hr “livable” when a house that typically takes up 30-50% of a persons monthly expense cost only 50k?

              • Flying SquidM
                link
                210 months ago

                Yes, which is completely superseded by the states minimum wage.

                Are you under the impression that state minimum wage can be lower than the federal minimum wage?

                So looking at Zillow, there’s 358 houses in Indiana that are less than 50k to purchase (over 1000, at less than 100k)… Why do you need 15$/hr? What makes 15/hr “livable” when a house that typically takes up 30-50% of a persons monthly expense cost only 50k?

                Got it, you’re one of those people who think the poor don’t deserve anything but the bare minimum society can possibly offer.

                And, of course, those 358 houses are evenly distributed across Indiana so that the only 358 people in Indiana being paid minimum wage can afford them. That’s exactly how things work.

                • Saik0
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  010 months ago

                  With minimum wage in Indiana being $7.25,

                  https://www.zillow.com/mortgage-calculator/house-affordability/

                  You can afford a house up to $67,530.

                  Keep in mind that this is availability RIGHT NOW. Meaning that the market has availability on TOP of what’s already occupied… and doesn’t include rentals. The market is NOT saturated.

                  those 358 houses are evenly distributed across Indiana

                  Looks pretty centered around population centers to me.

                  who think the poor don’t deserve anything

                  Right… which is why I’m advocating here that they should be able to buy a house? That’s the bare minimum to you? Jesus dude… you’re really off the mark here.

                  • Flying SquidM
                    link
                    110 months ago

                    All 358 of them?

                    Because only 358 people in Indiana are paid minimum wage?

                    Also, I have no idea how you calculated those numbers, but there is not a chance in hell that someone who makes less than $16,000 a year can afford a house. They can barely afford food. And who would give them a mortgage?

                    $16,000 a year is below the poverty line.

                    And yes, getting everyone into a home should be the bare minimum. Sadly, many people aren’t in them, including many people who work for minimum wage. Because, believe it or not, very few people will rent to you if you make that little.

                    I love how you say “I think the poor deserve things because I want 358 of them to own a house” and not “I want them all to be paid better.”