• @DandomRude
    link
    4
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Yes, seems so. But it’s really the weirdest thing, i’d say.

      • @DandomRude
        link
        110 months ago

        Damn, that’s another level of weird indeed.

    • Bigmouse
      link
      4
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Legally, it can be explained quite easily. Civil liability must only rise to the standard of “preponderance of the evidence”, meaning something like ‘more likely than not’. A criminial conviction however, must rise to the standard of “beyond reasonable doubt”. That’s the difference.

      • @DandomRude
        link
        310 months ago

        I get that. I just don’t understand why the public prosecutor’s office didn’t at least try. But hey, maybe they will later on. I guess we will have to wait and see.