• @Chekhovs_Gun
      link
      91 year ago

      Pretty sure that would result in negative karma, and thus the new reincarnated form would be even less desirable.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        61 year ago

        The word “desirable” in the context of human-only reincarnation opens a whole other can of worms

      • @Death_Equity
        link
        61 year ago

        There was no indication that karma or any such system was included, you included that into the scenario and it is therefore invalid.

        There would be people racing to get to the simplest organism incapable of sentience if there were a karmic system.

        • @Chekhovs_Gun
          link
          31 year ago

          That’s what the basis of reincarnation is about though… karma. You do good deeds, your karma level goes up, you get a better reincarnated life in the future. Likewise, the opposite is true as well.

          • @Death_Equity
            link
            61 year ago

            Karma is an aspect of the Hindu and Buddhist reincarnation beliefs. They do not have sole ownership of the concept of reincarnation.

            If they had said “What if Hinduism is right and reincarnation is real?” then that would be a different scenario. They only put forth that the concept of reincarnation was real.

            • @Chekhovs_Gun
              link
              11 year ago

              Ah I see what you mean now. Eh, regardless I’m sure the universe would have some sort of similar karmic system in place to prevent thatt suicidal loop hole.

              • AnyOldName3
                link
                41 year ago

                There’s no secular reason to think that the universe would care, or that a universe capable of caring would see it as a problem.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        Like what, a paramecium or baker’s yeast or something? At least I can’t have a collection agency coming after me then