Study Featuring AI-Generated Giant Rat Penis Retracted, Journal Apologizes
www.vice.com
A peer-reviewed study featured nonsensical AI images including a giant rat penis in the latest example of how generative AI has seeped into academia.

Study featuring AI-generated giant rat penis retracted entirely, journal apologizes::A peer-reviewed study featured nonsensical AI images including a giant rat penis in the latest example of how generative AI has seeped into academia.

  • @asdfasdfasdfEnglish
    15•1 year ago

    Why do you bring up race? Is there anything that would imply that?

    People are lazy and incompetent as fuck, and it’s been an industry wide problem that publishing companies in general have lower and lower standards of quality.

    • @drislandsEnglish
      0•1 year ago

      I brought it up purely as speculation, as one possible explanation for why the process was not properly followed. I don’t have any experience with publishing companies, whether for science journals or otherwise.

    • @[email protected]English
      -5•1 year ago

      He didn’t bring up race, he brought up location. Like, you’re the one that brought up race? If it was one American reviewer and one Australian reviewer and this poster said “the Austrian caught it”, would you have made the same comment you just did?

      What if the “reviewer based in India” is white?

      Edit: I am a ijit, I actually agree with you, and my “what if person based in india is white” should be directed at the guy you’re replying to.

      • JojoEnglish
        12•1 year ago

        He literally said

        I wonder if there was an element of racism that went into ignoring the reviewer’s concerns?

        So…

          • JojoEnglish
            6•1 year ago

            Happens to all of us from time to time.

        • @[email protected]English
          1•1 year ago

          I see you’re as bad at reading as I am, missing my edit and response!