• admiralteal
    link
    fedilink
    -19 months ago

    I am very skeptical of this plan, but if they’re accounting for all the additional traffic major port expansion will inevitably induce and are setting up comprehensive logistics hubs (and who’s paying for that, Amazon?) as part of the plan while actively banishing long-haul trucking from the scene, then I guess MAYBE it could work.

    But damn, it sure sounds like a cobra tail bounty to me.

      • admiralteal
        link
        fedilink
        29 months ago

        Thanks, that’s interesting.

        I’m getting fooled by the word “port” here. I don’t think I’d use the word port to describe a small barge hub like this.

        I still very much doubt it will have a big impact on traffic. Not unless they can honestly be run faster and more efficiently than the old logistics hubs. Downs-Thomson still applies here. But if it’s part of a comprehensive plan to getting more small delivery vehicles (e.g. eBikes) onto the roads and backed up with further congestion taxes and other regulations on the shippers, I could see it as a good way to by some time while working on more solutions.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          59 months ago

          It should take traffic off the bridge and tunnels, which is arguably the most expensive kind of traffic for Manhattan.