dantheclamman to politics English • 1 year agoAlabama Supreme Court Cites the Bible in Terrifying Embryo Rulingnewrepublic.comexternal-linkmessage-square79arrow-up1539arrow-down15
arrow-up1534arrow-down1external-linkAlabama Supreme Court Cites the Bible in Terrifying Embryo Rulingnewrepublic.comdantheclamman to politics English • 1 year agomessage-square79
minus-squareNougatlinkfedilink29•1 year agoTime to move to Alabama, freeze a bunch of embryos, and claim a fuck ton of dependents on my taxes.
minus-squaredantheclammanOPlink30•edit-21 year agoApparently in Georgia, a fetus in utero can count for a small tax credit. But generally, these psychos are not actually interested in the embryos themselves, merely in the concept as it relates to controlling the reproductive lives of other people
minus-squareNougatlinkfedilink18•1 year agoIf the “small tax credit” is in any way different from a regular dependent deduction, then a fetus in utero is not the same as a child ex utero.
minus-squaredantheclammanOPlinkEnglish4•1 year agoYeah, I’m not clear on whether it’s the same deduction or not. Either way, it’s surreal that we are actually discussing this as a real life scenario.
Time to move to Alabama, freeze a bunch of embryos, and claim a fuck ton of dependents on my taxes.
Apparently in Georgia, a fetus in utero can count for a small tax credit. But generally, these psychos are not actually interested in the embryos themselves, merely in the concept as it relates to controlling the reproductive lives of other people
If the “small tax credit” is in any way different from a regular dependent deduction, then a fetus in utero is not the same as a child ex utero.
Yeah, I’m not clear on whether it’s the same deduction or not. Either way, it’s surreal that we are actually discussing this as a real life scenario.