• SatansMaggotyCumFart
    link
    79 months ago

    It is concerning you think tampering with elections is OK.

    I haven’t said this so I don’t know why you’re trying to put those words in my mouth.

    It’s very dishonest.

    Do you know a mod I can speak to about this?

    • NeuromancerM
      link
      fedilink
      -89 months ago

      I am not putting words in your mouth. You are defending the FBI for tampering with two elections and don’t seem to grasp how concerning that is.

      We have several accounts of where the government is violating the 1st amendment with the press. Yet that doesn’t seem to concern you either.

      So if find it concerning, say so instead of defending the actions that enable it.

      • SatansMaggotyCumFart
        link
        49 months ago

        Now you’re accusing me of defending the FBI?

        I don’t think we’re having the same conversation.

        Just to double check do you mean the FBI or the DOJ?

        • NeuromancerM
          link
          fedilink
          -89 months ago

          FBI is part of the DOJ.

          Yes, or are you just trolling? Otherwise, what is the point of your statements?

          • SatansMaggotyCumFart
            link
            69 months ago

            I’m having a conversation with you even though you are being dishonest and trying to put words in my mouth that I am not saying.

            If you feel that I am trolling you (which I’m not) then use your powers as a mod to ban and censor me.

            If you want to continue to have this conversation then I’d appreciate you not putting words in my mouth or accuse me of trolling you.

            I am simply disagreeing with what you say and providing evidence while I do so.

            • NeuromancerM
              link
              fedilink
              -89 months ago

              If you feel that I am trolling you (which I’m not) then use your powers as a mod to ban and censor me.

              We are a light touch around here.

              am simply disagreeing with what you say and providing evidence while I do so.

              This is where your argument is circular. Maybe you do not realize it but let’s talk it through.

              My statement is that it is wrong for the FBI or any government agency to interfere with an election.

              You are saying you disagree with me.

              I then say I find it concerning you would support the FBI interfering with an election.

              You then say I am putting words in your mouth.

              It is either you find it concerning or you don’t. Otherwise, you would agree with me that it’s concerning the FBI keeps interfering with elections which is a danger to the Republic.

              Yet in your own words no, you haven’t provided evidence. The evidence is clear the FBI interfered with the election. I only know one poll that shows how it would have impacted the election but it’s a pretty shitty poll.

              I am simply disagreeing with what you say and providing evidence while I do so.

                • NeuromancerM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  -89 months ago

                  That is already proven. They lied about a material fact to avoid damage to Joe.

                  They did the same thing with Hillary. That is a violation of federal law.

                  Luckily for them Joe one and they won’t be prosecuted but it is just one of many ethical issues we are facing as a country.

                  • SatansMaggotyCumFart
                    link
                    79 months ago

                    It is not proven.

                    If James Comey did anything to sway the election why wasn’t he charged?

                    Same with the laptop, there has been no charges or convictions to do with it and there has been no charges or convictions of anyone surrounding it.