• @voracitude
    link
    -110 months ago

    Yes, and Chernobyl never exploded because Soviet engineers don’t make mistakes.

    Komarov did not know he was going to die in Soyuz 1, he was excited and happy to be going up and didn’t want Gagarin to get all the glory: https://www.npr.org/sections/krulwich/2011/05/02/134597833/cosmonaut-crashed-into-earth-crying-in-rage

    Science was so much better in the USSR there’s even a whole list of things about how much better it was: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Repression_of_science_in_the_Soviet_Union

    🤡

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      510 months ago

      Omg a Wikipedia article shit talking the USSR? Communism is over, pack it up boys.

      You can spew anti-communist Cold War era propaganda all you want.

      I know the USSR wasn’t perfect. But it really serves only the interests of the US empire to focus on that without ever mentioning all the bullshit anti-science shit the US and Western powers engaged in for centuries.

      Acting like only communist nations had issues is propaganda, plain and simple. Ignoring all the similar issues western capitalist nations had is propaganda, plain and simple.

      • @[email protected]OP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        410 months ago

        Michael Parenti - Blackshirts and Reds:

        The pure socialists’ ideological anticipations remain untainted by existing practice. They do not explain how the manifold functions of a revolutionary society would be organized, how external attack and internal sabotage would be thwarted, how bureaucracy would be avoided, scarce resources allocated, policy differences settled, priorities set, and production and distribution conducted. Instead, they offer vague statements about how the workers themselves will directly own and control the means of production and will arrive at their own solutions through creative struggle. No surprise then that the pure socialists support every revolution except the ones that succeed.

        I doubt the person you’re replying to is a socialist though ig. Prolly just a lib judging by them citing NATOpedia lol