3D prints still suffer from bad layer adhesion due to their 2.5D slicing and printing approach. I investigated if a novel slicing method that interleaves the layer could improve the strength of 3D prints.

  • Kata1yst
    link
    fedilink
    510 months ago

    Now we just need half-width extrusions on the outer wall!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      210 months ago

      The thumbnail shows a hexagonal tiling, which is like a brick-laying pattern but rotated 90 degrees, so the “half bricks” are on the top and bottom, not the sides.

      Maybe it would still work to orient the hexagons so the zig-zag part is on the walls, and then fill in the gaps with half-height half-width walls. Although “half” isn’t exactly correct; the hexagons give you ugly trig numbers.

      • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️
        link
        English
        110 months ago

        You don’t need any ugly trig. You can just use a magic number. The magic number in question is 0.8660254, which is the ratio between the width of the longways (point-to-point) to shortways (flat-to-flat) dimensions of a regular hexagon. If you need half of that, divide it by 2 afterwards.

      • Kata1yst
        link
        fedilink
        410 months ago

        Just an offhand idea. If you look at the print in the thumbnail, you can see that while this clever brick-interleaving has eliminated the straight lines along the xy plane, the Z axis still has straight lines. Eliminating that so you have a “brick-interleaving” in all axis seems the most optimal.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          110 months ago

          Oh, I see what you’re getting at, interesting. I hope these land in a slicer sometime, it would be interesting to try out.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Well you need either that or the video’s idea. I think yours could be easier to implement and it requires fewer z-movements (and no reordering, can’t remember if the video did that)