Survey of 154 scholars places 45th president behind even ‘historically calamitous chief executives’ linked to civil war

Donald Trump finished 45th and rock bottom of a list ranking US presidents by greatness, trailing even “historically calamitous chief executives” who failed to stop the civil war or botched its aftermath.

Worse for the likely Republican nominee this year, his probable opponent, Joe Biden, debuted at No 14.

“Biden’s most important achievements may be that he rescued the presidency from Trump, resumed a more traditional style of presidential leadership and is gearing up to keep the office out of his predecessor’s hands this fall,” Justin Vaughn and Brandon Rottinghaus, the political scientists behind the survey, wrote in the Los Angeles Times.

  • @FontMasterFlex
    link
    English
    11 year ago

    Why is it Obama or Biden’s responsibility to arm a foreign country?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      41 year ago

      Because for once, America is helping against an imperialist aggressor rather than encouraging it. It also happens to be in our best interest to show to other dictators how bad an idea it is.

      • @FontMasterFlex
        link
        English
        -61 year ago

        Fight your own battles instead of proxy wars?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          51 year ago

          OK. Now we get directly involved and Russia goes nuclear, or we don’t get involved at all and Russia takes over Ukraine.

          • @FontMasterFlex
            link
            English
            -31 year ago

            so it’s ok if Ukrainians die in the process. as long as it’s not americans right?

              • @FontMasterFlex
                link
                English
                -21 year ago

                FIght your own fight. This war by proxy shit is bunk. If he’s bad enough to stop, then let’s go fucking stop him. If he’s not then why waste our money and their lives? It could be over tomorrow if we really wanted it to be, but we’ll just string it along, drag it out. Fuel the war machine.

                  • @FontMasterFlex
                    link
                    English
                    -21 year ago

                    you don’t know that. and by being the first country to “go nuclear” they’d be putting a HUGE target on their backs. no way that would happen.

    • @iopq
      link
      01 year ago

      Because the US disarmed Ukraine in exchange for security promises. Time to actually live up to your promises

      • AbsentBird
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        Russia guaranteed Ukraine security for disarmament, the UK and US made assurances.

        • @iopq
          link
          111 months ago

          Well, it’s still shitty since everyone bullied Ukraine to disarm and then Russia invaded and the arm shipments are not enough to stop Russia from continuing to take land

          Iran and North Korea are better allies than the US and that sucks for global diplomacy

      • @FontMasterFlex
        link
        English
        01 year ago

        oh so why don’t we ACTUALLY DEFEND instead of just sending fuck tons of money are arms? like i said, this shit could be over tomorrow if anyone really wanted it to be. to many people are making too much money off of it. war is good for business incase you haven’t noticed.

        • @iopq
          link
          111 months ago

          I’m not saying we shouldn’t, I’m saying it’s better to send arms than not to send them