'Shark Tank' investor Kevin O'Leary warned businesses against incorporating in New York State after a ruling handed Donald Trump a nine-figure punitive damages fine.
So for those of you reading along at home, wintermule doesn’t dispute that there were false business records and false financial statements issued, nor dispute that there was intent to do so, nor dispute that there was conspiracy to do so.
People are like " Meh, sure we know he’s a liar and a crook, but whaddya gonna do? He’s our leader! You can’t punish him for breaking the law when nobody got hurt!"
Edit: I gotta say, I love how this guy is like a sovereign citizen bulldog: he thinks he knows what the law is and has a loophole he latches ono and won’t let go of it for nothing.
I get you don’t mind fascism but normal people do. Weaponizing the courts isn’t acceptable. No victim. No lost money. Everyone made money. The banks ever testified they’d do the deals again and hope to work with him in the future.
Obviously you’ve never paid attention to my views of Trump. He’s not my pick.
That said I don’t like corruption and the courts are acting corrupt. That is why the governor made a statement since so many companies have said they can’t risk doing business in NY
I would. The legal system should not be a weapon for political opponents. While Hillary committed a crime and should be prosecuted; it shouldn’t be done by the opposition. It comes off as banana republic style.
Irrelevant. Fraud requires a victim. Who was the victim?
So for those of you reading along at home, wintermule doesn’t dispute that there were false business records and false financial statements issued, nor dispute that there was intent to do so, nor dispute that there was conspiracy to do so.
People are like " Meh, sure we know he’s a liar and a crook, but whaddya gonna do? He’s our leader! You can’t punish him for breaking the law when nobody got hurt!"
Shameless.
No not false. Unaudited and the bank was aware and made adjustments. You really didn’t listen to anything in the case did you ?
This is how all commercial loans are done.
Oh I see. Not false, unaudited.
It’s like Not torture, Strong interrogation!
Or perhaps, Not teaching kids to pass standardized tests at the expense of creativity and critical thinking, The No Child Left Behind Act!
Not child abuse, after-school time with Miss Nancy!
Ok last one: Not pointlessly wreck a shit-ton of expensive equipment and kill a bunch of civilians, Operation Desert Storm!
Well anyway I did read the judgement. It seems to address your objections.
Then who is the victim ?
Who indeed? You’re free to read it too. You could put your energy into that instead of demanding answers from random people and practicing DARVO.
Here, i share the link
https://d3i6fh83elv35t.cloudfront.net/static/2024/02/nyag-v-trump-verdict-20240216.pdf
Edit: I gotta say, I love how this guy is like a sovereign citizen bulldog: he thinks he knows what the law is and has a loophole he latches ono and won’t let go of it for nothing.
Apparently you the way you cry to everybody about it.
“Trump lied and got more money? But who’s money? That’s right, nobody!”
I get you don’t mind fascism but normal people do. Weaponizing the courts isn’t acceptable. No victim. No lost money. Everyone made money. The banks ever testified they’d do the deals again and hope to work with him in the future.
Sounds like you feel like you are th victim.
Defending dishonesty and wanting them to be president sure sounds like fascism to me. But go ahead and keep believing that Trump is an innocent man.
Obviously you’ve never paid attention to my views of Trump. He’s not my pick. That said I don’t like corruption and the courts are acting corrupt. That is why the governor made a statement since so many companies have said they can’t risk doing business in NY
It’s lovely you think I care what you think.
“Lock her up! Lock her up!”
A presidential candidate calling for that exact thing is acceptable though. Got it.
Did they lock her up?
Ah, yes.
I love when you ignore the point to focus on something else because you know I’m right.
Predictable as clockwork.
Now you’ll declare victory and run away.
You’re not right. Nobody was prosecuted. The courts were not used. It’s apples and oranges.
Maybe read what I actually said.
It sounds like you’re fine with presidential candidates threatening to weaponize the courts so long as they’re lying and/or incompetent?
You’d protest if Clinton actually got prosecuted then?
I would. The legal system should not be a weapon for political opponents. While Hillary committed a crime and should be prosecuted; it shouldn’t be done by the opposition. It comes off as banana republic style.