• NeuromancerOPM
    link
    fedilink
    -47 months ago

    It’s debatable if any of these crimes are legit or if so at a prosecutable scale. He shouldn’t be prosecuted by democrats who don’t want him to run.

    Clinton violated various laws around classified data. The victim is the United States government and the people of the United States. She stored classified data on a personal email server knowing it was against federal law. She also try to avoid record retention laws by sending data to a private server and deleting it without it being reviewed or stored.

    • @Zombiepirate
      link
      37 months ago

      Cool, so if Trump purposefully retained classified data knowing that it was against federal law, then he should be prosecuted too, right?

      And not be the GOP nominee?

      • NeuromancerOPM
        link
        fedilink
        -47 months ago

        As president it’s debatable if he committed a crime.

        Biden as VP did commit a crime.

        So let’s prosecute both and throw in Hillary as well.

        • @Zombiepirate
          link
          1
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          It’s only “debatable” if you’re special pleading.

          Trump knowingly retained documents after he was told by law enforcement to return them.

          Biden told the archives that he had the documents and returned them ASAP, letting investigators search his properties.

          Trump gave investigators the runaround and moved stuff to avoid detection; and most notably: he was no longer president when he had those documents.

          Who was Biden’s victim? The archives didn’t even know he had them until he let them know.

          • NeuromancerOPM
            link
            fedilink
            -47 months ago

            ASAP isn’t years later.

            Who was the victim? The people of the United States. Good got that an easy answer.

            The fbi even said Joe willfully kept the data knowing it was illegal but he’s too impaired to have committed a crime. lol.

            • @Zombiepirate
              link
              27 months ago

              More dishonest rhetoric. Big surprise there.

              So it’s your belief that Trump victimized the American people? And you’re still going to vote for him?

              The fbi even said Joe willfully kept the data knowing it was illegal but he’s too impaired to have committed a crime. lol.

              This is a lie, you’re just mad that he was exonerated. They never said he kept them “willfully,” and “knowing it was illegal.”

              And who let the archives know that Biden had those docs as soon as they were discovered? Moreover, how can you inform someone that you have something if you’re ignorant of that fact?

    • @NewPerspective
      link
      27 months ago

      We have a place where we debate if something is a crime: court. The same court that said Hillary is innocent and Trump is guilty/a rapist/a fraud. It’s not perfect but it’s better than listening to internet armchair lawyers.

      • NeuromancerOPM
        link
        fedilink
        -37 months ago

        Really which court said it wasn’t a crime?

        Which court said Trump is a guilty of rape?

        You’re just making things up now.

          • NeuromancerOPM
            link
            fedilink
            -37 months ago

            No. You just have no clue what you are talking about.

            Comey isn’t a court. It’s why he was fired was he’s unorthodox handling of the case. So which court said it wasn’t a crime? Court. Not fbi.

            That’s a civil case. Civil cases find you liable and not guilty. They couldn’t do a criminal case because they knew the evidence would be sufficient for a criminal conviction. In most states, the civil case would have been kicked out because of lack of evidence. Yet banana republic courts took it anyways.

            Either way, as expected you were wrong on both items.

            • @NewPerspective
              link
              27 months ago

              Keep moving the goal posts, nobody takes you seriously anyway

              • NeuromancerOPM
                link
                fedilink
                -37 months ago

                The goal post isn’t moved. You just don’t know what you are talking about. That’s fine, admit it, learn and then have a more informed opinion.

                Also in the civil case, he was going liable for sexual assault, not rape. The judge for some reason felt the need to clarify when the jury disagreed.

                • @NewPerspective
                  link
                  27 months ago

                  Watching you step on your own toes is the best entertainment on Lemmy

                  • NeuromancerOPM
                    link
                    fedilink
                    -27 months ago

                    Such as an odd thing to say when everything you said was incorrect. You think the FBI is a court system. That sexual assault is rape and that civil cases make you guilty.

                    It explains much about you though.