Hillary Clinton is warning about the legality of birth control in the wake of a decision by the Alabama Supreme Court that found frozen embryos created through fertility treatments are children under state law.

“They came for abortion first. Now it’s [in vitro fertilization], and next it’ll be birth control,” the 2016 Democratic presidential nominee and secretary of State said in a post on X, the platform formerly known as Twitter.

“The extreme right won’t stop trying to exert government control over our most sacred personal decisions until we codify reproductive freedom as a human right,” Clinton added.

  • @UnderpantsWeevil
    link
    011 months ago

    You need 50 Dem senators willing to overturn the filibuster

    Which they have had on repeated occasions.

      • @UnderpantsWeevil
        link
        011 months ago

        1993, 2007, 2021…

        Hell, Bill Frist offered to blow up the Filibuster with the Nuclear Option back in 2003. A minority of Dems could have simply let him, rather than caving on Judicial nominees.

        • @assassin_aragorn
          link
          011 months ago

          There were not 50 willing to kill the filibuster in 2021. Manchin and Sinema were against it.

          • @UnderpantsWeevil
            link
            011 months ago

            There was never a vote for or against removing the Filibuster. The rules decision was one more sloppy rush job by a mismanaged Senate.

            • @assassin_aragorn
              link
              111 months ago

              You’re presupposing then that if there was a vote, they’d have gotten rid of it

              • @UnderpantsWeevil
                link
                011 months ago

                I’m not presupposing anything. I’m observing the failure of the Senate leadership to hold open the vote.

                • @assassin_aragorn
                  link
                  111 months ago

                  Your argument then is that the Senate could have held a vote to overturn the filibuster, but not that it would necessarily pass. And that would be true for every year and every day, the Senate could have voted on that during every presidential administration.

                  • @UnderpantsWeevil
                    link
                    011 months ago

                    Your argument then is that the Senate could have held a vote to overturn the filibuster

                    Right. They failed to hold a vote, which is the first necessary step to winning a vote.