@tulipas to TechnologyEnglish • 7 months agoThe highest funded plagiarist is probably this AI ethicistandreasplagiarism.wordpress.comexternal-linkmessage-square17arrow-up1156arrow-down114
arrow-up1142arrow-down1external-linkThe highest funded plagiarist is probably this AI ethicistandreasplagiarism.wordpress.com@tulipas to TechnologyEnglish • 7 months agomessage-square17
minus-squareHACKthePRISONSlinkfedilink4•7 months agoplagiarism is an academic crime. failing to cite a source is completely amoral.
minus-square@just_another_personlinkEnglish0•edit-27 months agoNo, it’s also possible to be sued for plagiarism, so defacto punitive. I would also err on the side of ethics versus morality for something that doesn’t directly and intentionally do harm on its outset.
minus-squareHACKthePRISONSlinkfedilink2•7 months ago>would also err on the side of ethics versus morality this makes no sense.
minus-squareHACKthePRISONSlinkfedilink1•7 months agothat doesnt mean its immoral. and as far as i can tell, its not even true. you can be sued for copyright infringement but plagiarism is not codified.
plagiarism is an academic crime.
failing to cite a source is completely amoral.
No, it’s also possible to be sued for plagiarism, so defacto punitive.
I would also err on the side of ethics versus morality for something that doesn’t directly and intentionally do harm on its outset.
>would also err on the side of ethics versus morality
this makes no sense.
that doesnt mean its immoral.
and as far as i can tell, its not even true. you can be sued for copyright infringement but plagiarism is not codified.
Do you know the difference?
yes