A loud minority of Texans call for Independence, which is not really possible as far as I know, BUT could the Rest of the USA just kick another state (Not necessary Texas) out? Or is this also not possible?

  • Flax
    link
    fedilink
    English
    261 year ago

    Wonder though, does that mean states can combine?

    • @dhork
      link
      English
      381 year ago

      Actually, yes, but that has never happened.

      • @chuckleslord
        link
        131 year ago

        Yeah, because you’re giving up federal power for… a bigger state budget? Not really a great trade.

        • @LemmyFeed
          link
          11 year ago

          “By your powers states combined, I am Captain Planet!”

      • @Fosheze
        link
        English
        31 year ago

        Make the MIMAL voltron.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      101 year ago

      It’s laid out very explicitly in the COTUS (Article IV, Section 3, Clause 1):

      New States may be admitted by the Congress into this Union; but no new State shall be formed or erected within the Jurisdiction of any other State; nor any State be formed by the Junction of two or more States, or Parts of States, without the Consent of the Legislatures of the States concerned as well as of the Congress.

      The funny thing is that during the civil war, West Virginia seceded from Virginia, and Congress voted to allow it and they were accepted into the union. There are a lot of people who argue that when that happened it was unconstitutional. However, it has never been tested, as far as I know.

      • Flax
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        That’s a new word. We have POTUS, FLOTUS, SCOTUS and now COTUS.

      • @John_McMurray
        link
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That would almost imply the Confederacy had legally left the USA, and Wrst Virginia legally left the Confederacy and joined the Union. Basically you could say none of this was un constitutional if the Confederacy was not a part of the USA at the time.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          I would be doing it a disservice to try and explain it myself, but there were a lot of legal theories on how they could justify WV without justifying the Confederacy leaving the union. It’s an interesting topic.

          • @John_McMurray
            link
            11 year ago

            Seems like it’d be easier, more honest and less “Jump through hoopy” to just say they left and we reconquered them. Unless you really don’t want think states leaving is legal when it probably is.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              You’re mistaking the fact that I recognize a limitation of myself with something else.

              • @John_McMurray
                link
                1
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                If what I said wasn’t fairly accurate, there’d be no need for legal arguments so arcane you don’t feel capable of describing them accurately.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  11 year ago

                  One thing I am pretty good at is recognizing blatantly bad logically fallacious arguments on the internet, such as the classic “false dichotomy.”

                  • @John_McMurray
                    link
                    1
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    No, you clearly aren’t, especially if you think this is a false dichotomy. I’m sorry, you were right about your limitations.