Just gotta catch them “target attacking creature becomes blocked” effects. Or maybe she really wants to [[ram through]].
I’m pretty sure that came up when I was workshopping this with my cousin and I just never fixed it. The protection clause was mostly just trying to match her other versions in a new way.
Yeah, but if an effect was printed on an instant that said “target creature becomes blocked” she wouldn’t deal any damage that combat without trample, even though there’s no creature blocking her. I don’t think the situation exists right now, and I definitely didn’t put it in this set, so I’m just taking out my ass here. She shouldn’t have both.
Trample and protection from creatures is certainly a choice…
Just gotta catch them “target attacking creature becomes blocked” effects. Or maybe she really wants to [[ram through]].
I’m pretty sure that came up when I was workshopping this with my cousin and I just never fixed it. The protection clause was mostly just trying to match her other versions in a new way.
But she can’t be blocked due to, you know, protection from creatures. She would however be great in a deck based around Ram Through.
Yeah, but if an effect was printed on an instant that said “target creature becomes blocked” she wouldn’t deal any damage that combat without trample, even though there’s no creature blocking her. I don’t think the situation exists right now, and I definitely didn’t put it in this set, so I’m just taking out my ass here. She shouldn’t have both.
[[card name]] to call