Github dislikes email “aliases” so much that they will shadow ban your otherwise normal activities for months, and once flagged, support will request not only a “valid” email domain but also that you remove the “alias” email from the account completely.

    • Atemu
      link
      fedilink
      259 months ago

      Github is unfortunately the premier platform for collaborating with others to build FOSS. Until alternative forges support federation, any other forge is usually a dead end.

        • Atemu
          link
          fedilink
          179 months ago

          Federated Git has been a thing ever since git was conceived:

          git send-email
          
          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            39 months ago

            They mean like I want to be able to open an issue on your instance using an account on my instance. Forjero is working in this

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              29 months ago

              The mailing list or maintainer email can accept your issues. You don’t have to have a code forge.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  29 months ago

                  Sure. I love being able to browse code without checking out your bloated monorepo, but it isn’t a requirement.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    29 months ago

                    I mean more about the features that forges provide, not just a WUI for browsing code. Namely: tracking hundreds of issues, PRs, etc

        • @coolkicks
          link
          English
          89 months ago

          GitHub has 28 million public repos

          Gitlab is has less than an order of magnitude as many Under a million in 2020, and nearly 80% without FOSS license.

          Is it everyone’s favorite, or best, or most feature rich. Nah. Is it where the FOSS projects are. Yes.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            69 months ago

            Is this why Freedesktop, GNOME, KDE, Haskell, & others self-host their GitLab community editions? These must not be the real FOSS projects.

            • @coolkicks
              link
              English
              59 months ago

              Sure, self-hosting is a great option for very large projects, but a random python library to help with an analytics workflow isn’t going to self-host. Those projects, along with 27,999,990 others have chosen GitHub, often times explicitly to reduce the barrier to contribution.

              Also, all of those examples are built on thousands of other FOSS projects, 99% of which aren’t self-hosting. This is the same as arguing only Amazon is a bookseller and ignoring the thousands of independent book publishers creating the books Amazon is selling.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                29 months ago

                This isn’t to say every project should self-host, but that they could self-host. And if you don’t want to self-host, you can join groups like Notabug, or a server hosted by a foundation like Codeberg, or the privately-held SourceHut, or even the open-core GitLab with its free tier (tho publicly-traded, most of the source is open & one can run the community edition if they wish). To assume if not self-hosted GitLab CE, then one must use a closed-source, US-based, publicly-traded, megacorporate, social media + code forge platform that’s trying to monopolize the developer tooling space is a false dichotomy.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        The pull request model Microsoft GitHub force on users ends up being a colossal waste of everyone’s time & it’s the only model offered. It’s also a social media platform which encourages star hacking, READMEs that are actually RENDERMEs, focusing too much on making one’s graph green, etc. that are bad for project quality & mental health IMO. This doesn’t sound like a “premier” platform but the result of lock-in & network effect. The way to break is to go host elsewhere… & since Git is a distributed version control system, this should be encouraged.

          • Atemu
            link
            fedilink
            49 months ago

            Because the projects I want to contribute to are on Github, not some other forge. Also, I don’t want to create accounts on dozens of forges; each with their own settings and whatever; I also don’t want to have to put contributors to my projects through that, so if I want external contributors, Github is pretty much my only choice.

            I don’t like it but until federation between forges is a thing, Github it is.

              • Atemu
                link
                fedilink
                39 months ago

                Yeah, they’re gatekeepers. We know. Even EU regulators have noticed and are finally making baby steps on cracking down on them.

                Though just as with Twitter and Reddit, we need a resilient decentral OSS alternative for this to work. That’s in the works as we speak but it’s not here yet. It’s like trying to give up Reddit 3 years a go; there was no viable alternative.