nifty to Programmer [email protected] • 1 year agoStop using floatsimagemessage-square93arrow-up1786arrow-down135
arrow-up1751arrow-down1imageStop using floatsnifty to Programmer [email protected] • 1 year agomessage-square93
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•1 year agoWouldn’t noise in the circuit mean it’d only be reliable to certain level of precision, anyway?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•edit-211 months agoI mean, every irrational number used in computation is reliable to a certain level of precision. Just because the current (heh) methods aren’t precise enough doesn’t mean they’ll never be.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•11 months agoYou can always increase the precision of a computation, analog signals are limited by quantum physics.
Wouldn’t noise in the circuit mean it’d only be reliable to certain level of precision, anyway?
I mean, every irrational number used in computation is reliable to a certain level of precision. Just because the current (heh) methods aren’t precise enough doesn’t mean they’ll never be.
You can always increase the precision of a computation, analog signals are limited by quantum physics.