• @FrowingFostek
    link
    -141 year ago

    Oof that’s not a great idea. Protecting sovereignty is a hard enough sell internationally. Selling an invasion isn’t something the international community is really showing an interest in right now.

    • WilshireOP
      link
      fedilink
      241 year ago

      They just mean weapons should be used to strike targets in Russia, not an invasion.

      • @FrowingFostek
        link
        81 year ago

        I support striking Russian military targets. I don’t support a ground invasion. So if what your saying is true I agree.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          41 year ago

          I don’t support a ground invasion either, but then Russia went and invaded and here we are.

          They ought to be driven back to Moscow and actually liberate some people living under a dictator.

          I’d be happy with pushing the orcs a mile across their border with the threat to push them further if they don’t stop.

        • @NOT_RICK
          link
          English
          81 year ago

          Yeah they won’t be using nukes regardless of how the west “escalates”. They can leave Ukraine and end this whenever they want.

        • partial_accumen
          link
          51 year ago

          The issue is escalating where Russia feels the need to use nukes. That is a no win for everyone.

          If the other option is just letting Russia run continuously unchecked across sovereign nations, then I guess we eat some nukes. However, Russia knows the first nuke they detonate means not even their liege, China, will defend them.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            Hitler ordered the complete destruction of Germany before he was finished. You never know what Putin is going to do.