For example, Mystique being transgender and Morph being non-binary.

  • PizzaMan
    link
    fedilink
    10
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    they want marriage to be defined as a man and a woman

    Exactly.

    Is that your earth-shattering evidence?

    It crossed my mind to link more, but I knew you wouldn’t even be able to handle this one. Best to stick to one at a time, lest you ignore the rest as you often do.

    That is from 2016, but it is the current platform.

    If it doesn’t represent the GOP, then they shouldn’t have it on their site. They chose to keep it up because that bigotry hasn’t changed.

      • PizzaMan
        link
        fedilink
        8
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Agreed. That’s why I stopped after only one. It just not worth it to hunt down the rest of the examples and format them here.

        I’m not gonna put effort in just for it to get dismissed out of hand, ignored, or some other weak excuse to be brought up.

    • NeuromancerM
      link
      fedilink
      -159 months ago

      I don’t see that as anti-gay. I fully support gay marriage but to me that’s a yawn

        • NeuromancerM
          link
          fedilink
          -159 months ago

          If we use that logic, Bill Clinton and Obama were anti-gay as well. Bernie Sanders, as well.

          • PizzaMan
            link
            fedilink
            99 months ago

            You’re equating a position the GOP presently, publicly stands by to the past positions of individuals who have since changed their minds, and are misquoted.

            Stop with the unicorns and magic.

            • NeuromancerM
              link
              fedilink
              -149 months ago

              I’m not. I don’t think being pro-traditional marriage is anti-gay. Anti-sodomy laws are anti-gay but I don’t feel the same way about marriage.

              • PizzaMan
                link
                fedilink
                89 months ago

                being pro-traditional marriage is anti-gay.

                Being “pro traditional marriage” necessarily discriminates against gay couples.

                • NeuromancerM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  -129 months ago

                  Not sure you get discrimination. It just means to choose. So yes, it is discriminatory but that doesn’t make something illegal or wrong. I suppose you’re not old enough to remember the old coffee commercial about discriminating taste. As I said I support it but there is a weird religious sect of the Republican Party that I wish we could remove.

                  Who you marry is really none of my business.

                  • PizzaMan
                    link
                    fedilink
                    69 months ago

                    but that doesn’t make something illegal or wrong

                    You just can’t help but immediately move to the next goal post can you?

            • PizzaMan
              link
              fedilink
              6
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              You’re not going to get a citation, logic, or reason. You’re gonna get magic and unicorns.

            • NeuromancerM
              link
              fedilink
              -109 months ago

              Huh? SCOTUS made gay marriage legal. Which person do you think made it legal?

        • NeuromancerM
          link
          fedilink
          -109 months ago

          I think you are confused. My trans friend is married and could have been married before SOTUS approved it.

          Also, my friend isn’t into gay rights. While you think LBGTQ+ is a monolithic group, it isn’t. She isn’t anti-gay rights, but gay rights don’t concern her. She is VERY into trans rights.