@[email protected] to TechnologyEnglish • 1 year agoThe HDMI Forum rejected AMD's open source HDMI 2.1 implementationwww.gamingonlinux.comexternal-linkmessage-square154fedilinkarrow-up1863arrow-down110cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1853arrow-down1external-linkThe HDMI Forum rejected AMD's open source HDMI 2.1 implementationwww.gamingonlinux.com@[email protected] to TechnologyEnglish • 1 year agomessage-square154fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squarestrawberrylinkfedilink6•1 year agothe shenenigans with USB 3 naming you mean? you’re right, this would be too logical for USB lol
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•1 year agoDon’t worry, they made it worse with usb 4.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•1 year agoUSB 3.2 2x2 with 20 Gbps is the same as USB 4 Gen 2×2 with 20 Gbps USB 4 Gen3x2 has 40 Gbps and was then renamed to USB 4 1.0
the shenenigans with USB 3 naming you mean? you’re right, this would be too logical for USB lol
Don’t worry, they made it worse with usb 4.
oh they did? how so?
USB 3.2 2x2 with 20 Gbps is the same as USB 4 Gen 2×2 with 20 Gbps
USB 4 Gen3x2 has 40 Gbps and was then renamed to USB 4 1.0
jesus what the fuck