• FuglyDuck
    link
    English
    347 months ago

    If he’s mentally incompetent to stand trial, that should have been brought up during pre trial.

    They lost. They don’t get to rewind now that they don’t like the sentence.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      8
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Yeah, but he’s not mentally incompetent. This is an established behavior pattern for him. He tried this before last year with his ADHD. It was an obvious ploy then. It is an obvious ploy now.

      • Echo Dot
        link
        fedilink
        English
        97 months ago

        It’s a dumb tactic because ADHD does not render you incapable of standing trial.

        • @Zahille7
          link
          English
          47 months ago

          Neither does being autistic.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      47 months ago

      Neither ADHD nor autism count as ‘insanity’ defences. They’re neurological conditions, not mental illnesses that alter the perceived state of reality.

      They’re being advanced as mitigating factors for sentencing. He’s entitled to do that and any competent lawyer would (and should) be making these arguments.