The former president is now highly unlikely to stand trial in the Justice Department’s election interference case before November

The Supreme Court handed Donald Trump a massive victory on Wednesday by agreeing to rule on whether he is immune from prosecution for acts committed while he was president. The court will hear arguments on April 22 and won’t hand down a decision until June — which means it’s unlikely a trial in the Justice Department’s election interference case will commence before the election. If Trump wins the election, he’ll of course appoint an attorney general who will toss the case, regardless of how the Supreme Court rules this summer.

By Wednesday night, Trumpland was celebrating.

“Literally popping champagne right now,” a lawyer close to Donald Trump told Rolling Stone late on Wednesday.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    6610 months ago

    Of note, this has nothing to do with the $450,000,000 and $83,000,000 bonds he needs to put up very soon

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      4210 months ago

      It doesn’t matter. He can hold off on liquidation until November and if he wins, (which would mean there’s a strong chance the Senate flips), have his cronies pass a, " lol god emperors don’t pay for summary judgements" bill.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        4010 months ago

        No he can’t. The Special Monitor overseeing his assets and watching his books has the authority to start seizing assets until he’s satisfied the monetary requirements to appeal, and she can do that right now. And, there’s interest running on the meter until he does.

        He’s gonna pay whether he likes it or not.

        • @Tyfud
          link
          6
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Yes he can. Unfortunately. We all get to watch this birth of a dictator unfold in slow motion if Trump wins.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            110 months ago

            How? Given the powers that the Special Monitor has, how could he possibly avoid paying?

            RNC certainly doesn’t seem like a likely option right now, and nobody else has ponied up the money.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                3
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                I always figured the Jan 6 ones were a long shot, but these other two cases are done. He’s going to have to pay, and he can’t get an appeal unless he pays, thanks to NY law.

                That’s why it’s different from the federal ones.

                ETA: and he can’t just not pay, because the Special Monitor has a court-ordered obligation to ensure he pays his court debts. She’ll just seize his assets, which she has the power to do.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    110 months ago

                    It is different, because he’s not the one with the power over his finances. Having a court-appointed Special Monitor who oversees every financial transaction is not remotely the same as just expecting him to pay out of common decency (which he doesn’t have). Lack of evidence is not evidence of lack.

                    If he becomes dictator, of course it won’t matter, but that’s a future possibility, not a current reality.

            • Subverb
              link
              -1210 months ago

              He can pardon himself. And he will.

              • @SinningStromgald
                link
                1310 months ago

                I thought both were state charges and only federal charges could be pardoned?

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                7
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                These are state crimes. He can’t pardon himself from them.

                ETA: I was referring to the conversation context, which is his financial crimes, not the article, which are federal crimes.

              • @RunningInRVA
                link
                510 months ago

                You cannot pardon a judgement in a civil case.

        • blazera
          link
          fedilink
          110 months ago

          okay what has he seized so far? Trump’s already stated he’s not paying that amount

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            310 months ago

            I don’t know what she has seized. But that doesn’t mean she hasn’t or won’t. It just means we don’t know.

            But it doesn’t matter what Trump has said publicly, because he’s obligated to pay, and it’s not just up to him or his accountants whether he does.

            • blazera
              link
              fedilink
              310 months ago

              You’re operating under the reasonable logic of how this is supposed to work. But nothings gone how it’s supposed to work for Trump. He’s had a decade of very public crime and been found guilty in several different ways, but has so far not had any consequences enforced. guilty of rape, tax fraud, defamation, campaign finance violations, and bribery, and so far not a penny, much less jail time.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                110 months ago

                I would argue that the two NY cases have gone exactly as you’d expect. Nothing has happened in them that was particularly unusual. Typical rape case + defamation and a corporate fraud case. All already with judgments.

                And as far as collections go, it’s not like buying groceries. He doesn’t have to pay the full amount all at once (and probably can’t). He does have to front the money if he wants to appeal, though, and all he’s done is file for one. They won’t take it up until he’s paid up.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    110 months ago

                    Yes. The facts and conduct of the trial were typical, ordinary. I was not saying that rape is typical.

        • @guacupado
          link
          0
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          and she can do that right now.

          If she hasn’t, then she won’t. We all know what could and should happen, and we all know none of it has.

      • @dhork
        link
        English
        1610 months ago

        He wouldn’t even need to do that. He would just need to sell a few of those Top Secret documents to MBS, and all of a sudden the Trump Org has another 2 billion worth of business in Saudi Arabia

    • DarkGamer
      link
      fedilink
      110 months ago

      This judgment has far more frightening implications, if the president is above the law.