• @Anticorp
    link
    English
    2411 months ago

    Such things should not be allowed to exist.

      • @Anticorp
        link
        English
        511 months ago

        What’s the reason? A slightly cheaper cable where data isn’t needed?

        • @Sparkega
          link
          English
          6111 months ago

          Eliminates a malicious threat vector. Gives you piece of mind to charge your devices without worry that what you connect to is going to interact with your device.

            • @Sparkega
              link
              English
              311 months ago

              I’ll give you a piece of my mind.

              Just kidding. Thanks for the correction

        • @eyeon
          link
          2611 months ago

          it’s also safer when wanting to charge from untrusted chargers, though you can still get an adapter to block the data pins or just bring your own wall charger/battery when traveling

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        211 months ago

        I think power only cables should exist because they are significantly cheaper, but they should have some kind of marking to differentiate them enforced by the standard

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      211 months ago

      They are afaik not allowed to exist with USB C. And except for some very few very sketchy manufacturers, it’s also luckily not a thing in practice.