Yikes.

  • @graphite
    link
    English
    752 years ago

    Don’t we want these big platforms to adopt ActivityPub?

    No. We don’t. The more hands they have in the fediverse pie, the more influence they have over it. The more influence they have, the more control. The more control, the more at the whim of their decisions you are. The more at the whim of their decisions, the more power they have over you.

    This should be common sense at this point.

    • @Lemmino
      link
      English
      -52 years ago

      IMO this is such a shortsighted take and defeats the point of federation because of a knee jerk response.

      There is the potential for federation to grow massively with the injection of billions from big tech.

      • @graphite
        link
        English
        22 years ago

        There is the potential for federation to grow massively with the injection of billions from big tech.

        Sure, of course it would grow. But at what cost? And then who effectively owns it in the end? There’s an inevitable outcome - one that you apparently aren’t aware of.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        My take is that we should defederate them so that they don’t become the de facto instance in the Fediverse. That way, the Fediverse remains what it is now—open and truly decentralized. By defederating and discouraging them, we’re signaling to potential new users that they’ll be stuck in their own bubble.

    • @tatertime
      link
      English
      -82 years ago

      I don’t see how it would be possible to stop them to be honest.

      • @graphite
        link
        English
        12 years ago

        You may be right - perhaps it’s inevitable, one way or another. I don’t know.

        I’m passive at this point.