I am worried that there is not really a benefit of doing that, just more noise and energy consumption.

  • @[email protected]OP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    210 months ago

    That was an amazing read. Thank you.

    What do you say is the use case for separating guest Wi-Fi with the more “private” stuff on your network?

    As far as I understand… Basically all communications, even inside a network, are encrypted… So I guess you do that to avoid someone trying to exploit some vulnerability?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Basically all communications, even inside a network, are encrypted

      LOL, oh no.

      Even internet traffic isn’t encrypted by default.

      Sadly TCP/IP isn’t encrypted.

    • Strit
      link
      fedilink
      English
      610 months ago

      I think the main benefit is that Guests devices on your network can’t find and exploit your own devices.

        • @osprior
          link
          English
          810 months ago

          You can trust the person, without trusting their technical skills, such that they haven’t inadvertently installed malware on their own devices.

    • @AA5B
      link
      English
      310 months ago

      Remember that once you give the password out, they likely have the password from now on. They will always have access until you change the password.

      No, a lot of local traffic is not encrypted, especially residential. No, residential probably doesn’t use much authentication or separation of privileges.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I don’t want my guests to be able to access my home server or Omada controller for example, or spread malware (their phone may have malware without them even knowing). Also, I give the guest wifi to people other than friends, like contractors. Phone reception is horrible at my house so I give them the wifi so they can use wifi calling.