• @Maalus
    link
    English
    810 months ago

    Except you don’t get to ignore GDPR by saying “don’t expect our site to be private”.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      510 months ago

      GDPR is really designed to target software controlled by a single entity, but this isn’t that. The instances are responsible for their content, full stop. There’s no way of forcing an instance to delete content, and even if there were, since the admins are running it, there’s nothing stopping them from removing such a feature.

      There’s also nothing stopping admins from deleting content from their servers (it’s just a database, after all).

      • @Maalus
        link
        English
        510 months ago

        Well then, once the EU knows about Lemmy, it’ll be screwed. Again, you don’t get to make excuses when dealing with GDPR. The book will be thrown at you once you have EU citizen’s data, which lemmy obviously does. Saying “we made this application without it ever being possible to comply with GDPR” will only get you a bigger fine, or worse.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          210 months ago

          “Lemmy” (the software) doesn’t have any data. It all resides on servers owned by people other than Lemmy’s developers. They have the user data and would absolutely be subject to GDPR.

          Again, no matter what Lemmy’s devs put in place, it doesn’t matter because the instance admins can do whatever they want.

          • @Maalus
            link
            English
            410 months ago

            Way to go being pedantic about it.

            Once they know about one server, they will know about most large instances. Since Lemmy doesn’t implement any GDPR features (i.e. cookie notices, a button for deletion, etc) every larger instance will get hit.