A left-wing United Kingdom politician has registered a landslide win in a parliamentary by-election on a platform promising to advocate for Gaza.

George Galloway won the seat in the northern English town of Rochdale after a fractious campaign, which saw the Labour Party withdraw support from its candidate over his anti-Israel comments.

Galloway won 12,335 votes compared with 6,638 for second-placed David Tully, an independent candidate. The former Labour candidate, Azhar Ali, came fourth after the opposition party pulled its support after he was recorded espousing conspiracy theories about Israel. Turnout was low at 39.7 percent.

“Keir Starmer, this is for Gaza,” Galloway said on Friday, referring to the Labour leader who initially refused to call for a ceasefire in Gaza where more than 30,000 people have been killed in the past five months of Israeli bombardment.

Late on Friday, Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, who supports Israel’s war, said the election of Galloway to a parliamentary seat was “beyond alarming” and accused him of dismissing Hamas’s October 7 attack.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    40
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    The summary doesn’t mention it, but the caption in the article photo says that George Galloway is the head of the Workers Party Of Britain, a socialist party that he founded in 2019.

    Their Wikipedia entry describes them as euroskeptics, anti-NATO, and says their website “defend[s] the achievements of the USSR, China, Cuba etc, not least the debt owed by humanity to the Soviet Union and Red Army in their war of liberation against German fascism”

    Wikipedia also describes the party as “adopting social conservatism, such as its rejection of gender self-identification.”

    So social conservatives who admire Russia, China, etc.

    What a weird world we live in…

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1010 months ago

          I’ve seen the people who claim to support anti-imperialism supporting Russian and Chinese territorial ambitions.

          It’s like when Americans talk about being for freedom. Do you take them on their word on that or look at what they are actually supporting?

          • @LinkerbaanOP
            link
            English
            -610 months ago

            The second of course. So did you take a look at what George Galloway’s positions are on that?

              • @LinkerbaanOP
                link
                English
                -6
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                My understanding of your comment is that you implied that Galloway is “supporting Russian and Chinese territorial ambitions.” As the above user called it a “tankie party”.

                Did I not understand that correctly?

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  410 months ago

                  I said it sounds like a tankie party based on the description from the OP of this chain. Then you (as I understand it) said it couldn’t be because it is anti-imperialist and I replied how it sometimes it’s a term tankies use without actually meaning it.

                  • @LinkerbaanOP
                    link
                    English
                    -410 months ago

                    I said that anti-imperialism does not equate being a Tankie. Which seems to be the new favorite slander word for liberals to paint anyone who is critical of American imperialism for.

        • @[email protected]B
          link
          fedilink
          English
          110 months ago

          Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

          Tankieeeee

          Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

          I’m open-source; check me out at GitHub.

    • @WaxedWookie
      link
      English
      910 months ago

      Sounds bas- ah fuck - they’re tankies.

    • @LinkerbaanOP
      link
      English
      -6
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      That wikipedia page has some very interesting quotes near the top

      The Jewish Labour Movement called the result a “triumph for hope and decency” over Galloway’s “toxic politics”. Galloway vowed to challenge the result on the basis of an alleged “false statement” made about him by Leadbeater and Starmer, which he said tipped the result of the by-election.

      Totally doesn’t look edited by the IDF for out-of-context cherry picked statements. Move along everyone nothing to see here.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -410 months ago

        Seems like this party has had quite a few allegations of antisemitism

        The party has defended Williamson, who was suspended from the Labour Party for his comments about antisemitism allegations in the Labour Party, and Ken Livingstone, who left the party following allegations of antisemitism.

        • @LinkerbaanOP
          link
          English
          -410 months ago

          Who made those antisemitism allegations? What anti-semitic things did they say can you quote that?

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                0
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                Does the link not work for you? It loads for a while but opens for me. Here’s the full article in picture form.

                I think this is the part Wikipedia is citing:

                "A vision statement on its website embraces Brexit, denounces the Labour Party for remaining “committed to capitalism” and suggests its former leader Jeremy Corbyn, “Was harangued as an anti-Semite in a disgraceful campaign of Goebbelsian fiction”.

                The party has also gone on record to defend former Labour members Chris Williamson and Ken Livingstone.

                Former Derbyshire MP Mr Williamson was suspended by the party after saying Labour had been “too apologetic” over anti-Semitism, while former London mayor Mr Livingstone resigned his membership after being accused of making anti-Semitic comments.

                Mr Carpenter stood by the Workers Party’s position and insisted both men had done nothing wrong.

                He said: “People aren’t questioning this narrative that’s been put to them from the centre. They all play the same game, whether it’s Labour, the Tories, the Lib Dems or even the Greens.”"

                You think maybe the IDF edited that Wikipedia page?

                Uhh, I have no idea? I mean from the Wakefield Express article and just googling it looks like there’s been some actual antisemitism row about this party, so it’s not made up (the row/allegations I mean), if that’s what you meant.

                • @LinkerbaanOP
                  link
                  English
                  -1
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  Jeremy Corbyn is a UK hero lauded for not bending the knee to the israeli lobby. Which famously always try to picture him as anti-semitic because he says Free Palestine.

                  Your link contains no anti-Semitic statement. I’m asking you once again, can you quote the anti-Semitic statement? Surely if he said anything anti-Semitic it shouldn’t be hard for you to find.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    110 months ago

                    I’m not sure if you think I’m the one making the argument or if you just want my help in finding what the allegations are about. Please clarify.

                    I’m asking you once again, can you quote the anti-Semitic statement? Surely if he said anything anti-Semitic it shouldn’t be hard for you to find.

                    Searching for “Corbyn antisemitism” it seems like the row is mostly about his actions or rather in-action against alleged antisemitism. Well, not counting this

                    The book, which Mr Corbyn in 2011 described as a “great tome”, has been criticised as anti-Semitic because it argues that European finance was driven “by men of a singular and peculiar race who have behind them many centuries of financial experience”.