Two of the three victims specifically singled out by the New York Times in a marquee exposé published in December, which alleged that Hamas had deliberately weaponized sexual violence during the October 7 attacks, were not in fact victims of sexual assault, according to the spokesperson for the Kibbutz Be’eri, which the Times identified as the location of the attack.

The Times article described three alleged victims of sexual assault for whom it reported specific biographical information. One, known as the “woman in the black dress,” was Gal Abdush. Some of her family members have contested the claims made by the Times. The other two alleged victims were unnamed teenage sisters from Kibbutz Be’eri whose precise ages were listed in the New York Times, making it possible to identify them.

When asked about the claims made by the New York Times, Paikin independently raised their name. “You’re talking about the Sharabi girls?” she said. “No, they just — they were shot. I’m saying ‘just,’ but they were shot and were not subjected to sexual abuse.” Paikin also disputed the graphic and highly detailed claims of the Israeli special forces paramedic who served as the source for the allegation, which was published in the New York Times, the Washington Post, CNN, and other media outlets. “It’s not true,” she told The Intercept, referring to the paramedic’s claims about the girls. “They were not sexually abused.”

  • @LinkerbaanOP
    link
    English
    5
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Tell the IDF to stop faking rape claims then. They told us back in November they had mountains of forensic evidence and thousands of witnesses. And now they can’t find a single CCTV recording and they lost the forensic evidence? They can’t even find two “witnesses” which corroborate a story.

    Until you find evidence it’s rather obvious these are nothing but lies to manufacture consent for the Genocide of Gaza.

      • @LinkerbaanOP
        link
        English
        2
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        A thousand false rape claims doesn’t make israel trustworthy.

        Back in october the IDF claimed they had forensic evidence of rape. Did they drop the evidence?

        A reserve warrant officer known by her first name, Avigayil, recounted finding maimed bodies, per Reuters. Multiple cases of rape were also discovered during forensic examinations.

        You think israel maybe uhhhh lied?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -4
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Who said about thousand? Know your place.

          This garbage far left keeps spouting nonsense.

          ‘Hamas never raped anyone. Yes I believe that.’

          There now satisfied?

          • @LinkerbaanOP
            link
            English
            -2
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            If people say you raped someone would you like them to present evidence?

            Especially if their claims keep getting proven false showing that actually no rape happened. Stooping so low to use Zaka as a source for their claims.

            Would you accept it if people just randomly started calling you a rapist too?

              • @LinkerbaanOP
                link
                English
                -4
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                You can keep screaming it over and over. Consider coming with evidence. People tend to take you more seriously when you do that.

                What’s that, there’s no evidence?

                • @FlowVoid
                  link
                  English
                  -39 months ago

                  There is eyewitness evidence, which you ignore as usual.

                  But it’s interesting to see that you think the UN is not a credible source. No doubt you’ll still keep quoting them when it serves your needs

                  • @LinkerbaanOP
                    link
                    English
                    -2
                    edit-2
                    9 months ago

                    No it’s literally Zaka and the discredited paramedic.

                    The UN employee got questioned by Journalists today and it’s just the same stuff from this NYT article.

                    A complete embaressment