• @hypertown
    link
    6010 months ago

    If translation layer can be banned with EULA how is wine not dead yet? M$ loves Linux or what?

      • @shankrabbit
        link
        English
        3110 months ago

        “…because it makes us money” could be put at the end of any slogan to make it 100% honest.

        • @kernelle
          link
          410 months ago

          USA: Oh yeah ofcourse I understand

          EU: Hmmmmmm

      • @hypertown
        link
        210 months ago

        Well for sure they profit on Linux but I doubt they are using Wine.

    • @General_Effort
      link
      1410 months ago

      The EULA of the CUDA SDK bans reverse engineering output of the SDK to make translation layers (and such compatibility aids in general).

      That makes it more legally dangerous and/or harder for devs. It has no effect on anyone not using the SDK.

      • @hypertown
        link
        1510 months ago

        How is that Nvidia can ban reverse engineering and for example Nintendo can’t. I’m sure they would love to just say in EULA that sorry but reverse engineering Switch is prohibited therefore every emulator is illegal

        • @General_Effort
          link
          610 months ago

          Well, maybe they can’t. This clause would probably not hold up in a lot of countries/courts. OTOH it would in others. It might take years of litigation to figure out.

          So, if you want to work on this kind of thing, better consult a lawyer first. It will have a chilling effect and that’s something.

          US situation: https://www.eff.org/issues/coders/reverse-engineering-faq

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -310 months ago

      I’m willing to bet that Linux is irrelevant to Microsoft. It doesn’t threaten them, Microsoft has it’s core business elsewhere

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        15
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Microsoft do make money from Linux though. For example, Microsoft SQL Server runs on Linux, and you can use Linux in Azure (both of which are part of their core business).

      • @shankrabbit
        link
        English
        1310 months ago

        Not that irrelevant. They even have their own distro: Mariner

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        310 months ago

        Microsoft’s operating system accounts for a vanishingly small percentage of server hosting, and their deathgrip on personal computing is starting to slip. (Particularly as Android has already replaced Windows as the most popular operating system.)

        Microsoft is well past “not worried”, looking at “too late to do anything about it” in the rear view mirror, and barreling toward “cease to exist if they don’t continue to stick the landing on interoperability with Linux and Android”.

        Microsoft’s long term relevance plan counts on cloud tools on Linux and their Office Suite on every platform.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            110 months ago

            Yeah. I can’t say I blame them, in that front.

            As someone who often runs apps on hardware the app was never meant to run on, it’s not great.

            There may be a unified Android / Linux package type coming, when more laptops are touchscreens and more phones are dockable workstations. But I doubt the Windows kernel will have much to do with either.

        • @Aux
          link
          110 months ago

          Microsoft is earning crap loads of money from Android. The more Android phones are being sold, the more money Microsoft gets.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            110 months ago

            Yeah. To be clear, I’m not calling them out. Just pointing out that Microsoft is very aware that Windows isn’t the future of the company, anymore.