Microsoft: Copyright law “no more an obstacle to the LLM than it was to the VCR.”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11 year ago

    So the real debate is whether training a model counts as copyright infringement. Training an LLM provides it with the means to create similar content. Does a prospective author reading around his topic of interest not do the same? The only real difference is the speed at which derived works can be created

    • lemmyng
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      An author taking someone else’s work, changing parts of it, and then selling it as new is plagiarism. The only difference is the speed at which the LLM can plagiarize its sources.

      • @Grimy
        link
        English
        2
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Generating new content influenced by someone else is not plagiarism

        • Bo7a
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          But didn’t you know that if I write in iambic pentameter and make up some flowery words to describe things that don’t already have a definition, I am literally Shakespeare?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          It depends on the level of influence in the new content. There were a number of articles that clearly showed derivative (even stolen) work by using innocuous phrases. For instance, any prompt with “video game” and “plumber” will create an unmistakable clone of Mario.

          I suspect the question will be whether these models could produce similar content without using the original content.