@ChunkMcHorkle to politics English • edit-210 months agoPermanently Deletedmessage-square96arrow-up1468arrow-down112
arrow-up1456arrow-down1message-squarePermanently Deleted@ChunkMcHorkle to politics English • edit-210 months agomessage-square96
minus-square@Maggotylink2•1 year agoIt seems that way but they couldn’t use algorithms the way they do without section 230 to shield them. And yeah I didn’t realize it was the mobile link. I’ll keep an eye out for that in the future.
minus-square@Armok_the_bunnylinkEnglish1•1 year agoYeah, content algorithms aren’t great, but revoking section 230 isn’t the way to solve that.
minus-square@Maggotylink2•edit-21 year agoI don’t think just repealing it is the answer either. But the way it is written and implemented is absolutely a part of the problem.
It seems that way but they couldn’t use algorithms the way they do without section 230 to shield them.
And yeah I didn’t realize it was the mobile link. I’ll keep an eye out for that in the future.
Yeah, content algorithms aren’t great, but revoking section 230 isn’t the way to solve that.
I don’t think just repealing it is the answer either. But the way it is written and implemented is absolutely a part of the problem.