@ChunkMcHorkle to politics English • edit-25 months agoPermanently Deletedmessage-square97arrow-up1468arrow-down112
arrow-up1456arrow-down1message-squarePermanently Deleted@ChunkMcHorkle to politics English • edit-25 months agomessage-square97
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish0•edit-27 months agoThere is no side of innocence in determining eligibility for office. The requirements laid out in the main body of the Constitution already make it clear that holding the office of President is not an inalienable right.
minus-square@aidanMlink1•7 months agoThe Constitution does however err on limiting impedances to popular democracy, especially post-Civil War
There is no side of innocence in determining eligibility for office. The requirements laid out in the main body of the Constitution already make it clear that holding the office of President is not an inalienable right.
The Constitution does however err on limiting impedances to popular democracy, especially post-Civil War