• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    2410 months ago

    Americans with boots on the ground for 20 years in Afghanistan and could not beat the Taliban. But sure, this time will be different.

    • @Jakdracula
      link
      1610 months ago

      As the Taliban say:

      “The Americans have the clock, but we have the time”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -810 months ago

      I hear this a lot, but what would beating the Taliban involve? While the US was there, the Taliban was at best in hiding, it was not holding territory. If you mean removing the very idea of the Taliban from the world? That is both hard to do and arguably also a genocide, at least a cultural one. The US has been good at that, but it’s also frowned on in the current world - see Gaza headlines.

      This is also why I’d suggest it’s kind of impossible to both not be the worst of the colonialist systems and stop terrorism (and it’s kind of unclear that even the colonial cultural suppression / conversion / excesses / crimes actually would stop terrorism).

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        10
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        what would beating the Taliban involve?

        What about taking more than 5 minutes to the Taliban to come back in power after the us left?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -710 months ago

          That seems a strange definition to me - so if a boxer gets back up after losing the match, well his opponent didn’t beat him in that fight?

          • Cowbee [he/they]
            link
            fedilink
            1410 months ago

            Are you under the impression that the US military and the Taliban were engaged in friendly competition for no reason whatsoever, just a bit of international banter?