Only the downloads were taken down
Some repos added instructions to compile through GitHub Actions

  • @Spotlight7573
    link
    English
    3610 months ago

    As for what these were, they are modified versions of the official YouTube app. What has been taken down is the full modified app files (.ipa) ready to install on an iPhone, not the source code to the tweaks that are in the repos.

    These modifications do things like replicate the paid YouTube Premium features, from the uYou features list for example:

    • Ad-Free Browsing: Bid farewell to interruptions and enjoy seamless video playback without annoying advertisements.
    • Background Playback: Keep your favorite videos running in the background while you multitask or lock your device.
    • Video and Audio Downloads: Download videos, shorts, and audio tracks in various formats, including MP4 and WebM, for offline viewing and listening pleasure.
    • […]

    You can see why Google would want to have them taken down. They aren’t even a re-implementation with their own code/UI like NewPipe.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1110 months ago

      So why are people in this thread glad google is doing this?

      I thought Lemmy was all pirates and anti monopolies, dont we all have adblock? And background playback used to be default. It was explicitly removed to exploit.

      I am not trying to argue but can someone explain why there rooting for the power addicted mega company?

      • @Evilcoleslaw
        link
        English
        2810 months ago

        The only comment I see being glad about it is a joke about the style of beer also called an IPA.

      • @Spotlight7573
        link
        English
        310 months ago

        I think there’s a difference between a third-party app/frontend and a modded app like these. One is at least trying to provide their own value, and stuff like NewPipe for example can support multiple services in the same UI, a feature I wish was better supported in streaming as I dislike trying to navigate all the individual apps. Modifying a service’s app to remove the ads while still consuming their bandwidth and not putting in the effort to make your own app feels worse for me for some reason. At least pirates generally tend to use their own bandwidth and servers to distribute things instead of leeching directly off the original.

        Hope that helps explain it for at least one person.

        • AatubeOP
          link
          fedilink
          3
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          It’s not just removing the ads, though. NewPipe also, of course, consumes YouTube’s bandwidth.

          • @Spotlight7573
            link
            English
            210 months ago

            I’m not saying NewPipe doesn’t use their bandwidth, just that taking YouTube’s app/UI code too just feels worse to me for some reason. It’s less about the logic of it and more about the feeling.

      • @pory
        link
        English
        2
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        The equivalents for Android, precompiled ReVanced APKs, are commonly used to spread malware. Following the instructions to patch the app yourself isn’t hard. Google taking down precompiled modded versions of YouTube but leaving patches and the the tools anybody can use to apply them is a neutral thing at worst.

        Also I don’t see anyone in this thread glad that Google did this, aside from the first half of the joke / fakeout / pun post about IPA beer.