• Emily (she/her)
    link
    fedilink
    798 months ago

    Cool party, stand for a lot of good things, including sex workers. I think they’re called “reason” now

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      67
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Spawned off an adult entertainment trade association.

      Reason is a merge of the Sex Party, Cyclists, and the NSW euthanasia party. Basically a broad tent party of single issue parties that have no reason to oppose each others goals. Sadly they haven’t faired too well at the polls last election.

      I’d love to see them merge with the Fusion party - itself a merger of the Science Party, Pirate Party, Secular Party, Vote Planet, and Climate Change Justice Party.

      And for all of them to stick with one bloody name so they can build up public recognition. At least people took notice of the Sex party name.

      • ℛ𝒶𝓋ℯ𝓃
        link
        fedilink
        278 months ago

        You all actually get more than two parties? America’s a dumpster fire at this point, I ought to jump ship soon…

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Sadly no.

          We have two main parties Lib and Lab. Both rightwing neoliberal parties , one is slightly more right to the other. Imagine a little bit more left Dems vs a little bit more right Dems.

          Our preferential system means all votes have to end in 2 parties. Thus any slightly left parties vote is funnelled to Labor and any slightly right parties goes to Liberal.

          We get the illusion of more than 2 parties.

          • @ziltoid101
            link
            38 months ago

            Ehh that’s a very cynical and kinda misleading take of how it works. This may be generally true in the house of representatives but still 12% of the seats don’t end up funnelled to the two major parties. In the senate a quarter of senators aren’t affiliated with either major party and at the moment it requires Labor to collaborate to pass bills, so although we do have two major parties we are nowhere near being a two-party system.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              48 months ago

              Mate that’s akin to saying the US is not a two party system due to having independents or third party senators.

              The democrats currently don’t have majority and rely on Bernie, King, and Sinema to pass bills.

      • @Viking_Hippie
        link
        68 months ago

        I’d love to see them merge with the Fusion party

        That would be nominative determinism at its finest 👌😁