The Senate approved a package of six appropriations bills ahead of a late-Friday deadline and sent it to President Joe Biden to become law after some haggling over amendments.

  • @givesomefucks
    link
    English
    88 months ago

    We need to budget a decade at a time, and we can still leave it up to adjustments annually

    The difference is essential shit will always be paid, if they can’t agree to adjustments for that year, it defaults to the long term plan.

    Every fucking year we run into this these days

    • Zerlyna
      link
      English
      28 months ago

      Seems like it’s every few months lately.

      • @givesomefucks
        link
        English
        28 months ago

        Yep, temps are so normalized that we’re getting close to the point we spend more of a year under a temp budget than the real one.

        We need to fix it, because the current way of doing it obviously isn’t working.

    • rhythmisaprancer
      link
      fedilink
      08 months ago

      I both agree with you and disagree. I agree that having a long term plan (beyond one year) would be amazing, but I disagree that essential things will always be paid. That is actually true, you are right, but the problem is that these other things that are, essentially, essential, will become nonessential. They just do not get done. And both the “customers” and the employees are expected to deal with it. It is a public-private pipeline. I hate it. For openness, I am a federal employee.

    • wildncrazyguy
      link
      fedilink
      0
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      To put it simply, this is just not how the legislative branch works. Most of their power derives from the power of the purse. People who are only in power for 2 years are not going to cede the main power that they invested so much time and money in order to obtain.

      Moreover, 10 years is a lifetime in politics. Our government already moves slow enough as is.

      Instead, I propose a few changes:

      1. Get rid of the debt ceiling fight. We already agreed to the commitment of funds.
      2. 3 people per house seat, based upon top 3 ranked choices. This will encourage minor parties and cooperation.
      3. I get that laws need to be long so that they cover loopholes, nuance, interpretation, sausage making, etc. but laws should have simple summaries that the general public can understand. At least one of these summary pages should read like a change log: new features, bug fixes, changes to existing stack, deletions, etc.
      4. Robust Sunshine laws for office holders and staff, except where classified for national security
      5. Continuing ed: Politicians or at least their support staff should be educated and qualified to understand what they are legislating on.
      6. Computer generated, panel approved district maps
      7. The fed has a dual mandate, something similar should be developed for politicians. Spend I’m lean times, save in boom times, but never stop aspiring to do great big things.