@MicroWave to politics English • 10 months ago‘Isn’t it past your jail time?’: Jimmy Kimmel wins cheers at Oscars with Trump jibewww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square123arrow-up1619arrow-down135file-text
arrow-up1584arrow-down1external-link‘Isn’t it past your jail time?’: Jimmy Kimmel wins cheers at Oscars with Trump jibewww.theguardian.com@MicroWave to politics English • 10 months agomessage-square123file-text
Oscars host makes comment onstage after ex-president writes scathing review of Kimmel on his Truth Social platform
minus-square@John_McMurraylink-20•edit-210 months agoCivil isn’t criminal, wasn’t convicted, unlike Kimmel’s friends.
minus-square@Dkarmalink11•10 months agoWorse. It was a finding of fact. It’s a fact that Trump is a rapist.
minus-squareHACKthePRISONSlinkfedilink-1•10 months agocivil only needs a preponderance of evidence. criminal requires beyond a reasonable doubt. but even that isn’t high enough, in my opinion, to justify the government taking away peoples’ freedom.
minus-square@John_McMurraylink-13•10 months agoYou can talk like you’re authoritative on the subject all you want, but that’s no where near true. Dude probably is, but proven? Nowhere near.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink9•10 months ago“You can talk like you’re authoritative on the subject…” Talks like they’re authoritative on the subject without providing a single shred of backup. 🤌
minus-square@John_McMurraylinkKreyòl ayisyen-2•10 months agoKnowing what “convicted” means is a pretty high bar to aspire to, I know, but keep at it, you’ll get it eventually.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•10 months ago“Decades ago, the now President of the United States raped me.” - E. Jean Carroll
minus-square@John_McMurraylink-2•10 months agohttps://www.cnbc.com/2024/03/10/trump-denies-carrolls-claims-after-posting-91point6-million-bond-.html You guys aren’t nearly as clever as you think,
Civil isn’t criminal, wasn’t convicted, unlike Kimmel’s friends.
Worse. It was a finding of fact. It’s a fact that Trump is a rapist.
civil only needs a preponderance of evidence. criminal requires beyond a reasonable doubt. but even that isn’t high enough, in my opinion, to justify the government taking away peoples’ freedom.
You can talk like you’re authoritative on the subject all you want, but that’s no where near true. Dude probably is, but proven? Nowhere near.
“You can talk like you’re authoritative on the subject…”
Talks like they’re authoritative on the subject without providing a single shred of backup.
🤌
Knowing what “convicted” means is a pretty high bar to aspire to, I know, but keep at it, you’ll get it eventually.
“Decades ago, the now President of the United States raped me.” - E. Jean Carroll
https://www.cnbc.com/2024/03/10/trump-denies-carrolls-claims-after-posting-91point6-million-bond-.html You guys aren’t nearly as clever as you think,
Removed by mod
You still haven’t figured out what convicted means.