@[email protected] to Not The OnionEnglish • 4 months agoNeil deGrasse Tyson Complains That “Dune 2” Isn’t a Shining Beacon of Scientific Accuracyfuturism.comexternal-linkmessage-square143fedilinkarrow-up1364arrow-down152cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1312arrow-down1external-linkNeil deGrasse Tyson Complains That “Dune 2” Isn’t a Shining Beacon of Scientific Accuracyfuturism.com@[email protected] to Not The OnionEnglish • 4 months agomessage-square143fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish75•4 months agoThis motherfucker watched a movie where a girl inherits all of the memories of her 4 most recent female ancestors because her mother used drugs while she was pregnant and he’s like “that isn’t how sound moves through sand”
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish6•4 months agoThat’s the story of dune, and it was covered in the 1984 movie. Idk if the new one gets into it I haven’t seen it yet
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•4 months agoIt wouldn’t be Dune without being overenthusastic about the capabilities of psychedelics.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish4•4 months agoOh yeah, and it gets weirder from there.
minus-squareVulKendovlinkfedilinkEnglish2•4 months agoHe’s a physicist, so he’s obviously going to comment on the physics. He might’ve commented on it if he was a geneticist, ob/gyn, or pharmacist.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•4 months agoOr he could have the insight that this story wasn’t going for scientific accuracy
This motherfucker watched a movie where a girl inherits all of the memories of her 4 most recent female ancestors because her mother used drugs while she was pregnant and he’s like “that isn’t how sound moves through sand”
Is that an actual movie cause that sounds wild
Yeah that’s dune
That’s the story of dune, and it was covered in the 1984 movie. Idk if the new one gets into it I haven’t seen it yet
It wouldn’t be Dune without being overenthusastic about the capabilities of psychedelics.
Oh yeah, and it gets weirder from there.
He’s a physicist, so he’s obviously going to comment on the physics. He might’ve commented on it if he was a geneticist, ob/gyn, or pharmacist.
Or he could have the insight that this story wasn’t going for scientific accuracy