• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    739 months ago

    Obviously knows neither the spirit nor the letter of established law…Texas huh? Yeah, that tracks.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      17
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      We have a law in Texas that an Atheist can’t hold office. Really stupid, but it would have to be challenged to get rid of it.

      edit: went and looked it up

      Article 1, Section 4 of the Texas Constitution states, “No religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office, or public trust, in this State; nor shall anyone be excluded from holding office on account of his religious sentiments, provided he acknowledge the existence of a Supreme Being.”

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        109 months ago

        I’ll gladly acknowledge the existence of a supreme being; my tuxedo cat is very supreme.

        …we don’t have to say which being is supreme, right?

      • Bahnd Rollard
        link
        English
        4
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        By that verbage, claiming to be pastafarian meets those requirments.

        Would pay good money to see a official painting of someone with a collander on their head.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Technically a Satanist does too.

          edit: though you’d have to “really believe”

      • @bostonbananarama
        link
        English
        29 months ago

        We have a law in Texas that an Atheist can’t hold office. Really stupid, but it would have to be challenged to get rid of it.

        Just to be clear that’s unconstitutional. That law has no force or effect.

        Torcaso v. Watkins, 367 U.S. 488 (1961)

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Yes, it’s unconstitutional…buuut, the shitty way our political system works, somebody would have to sue to get it removed in Texas. Until someone does, they’re going to enforce it.

          edit: in Texas

          • @bostonbananarama
            link
            English
            09 months ago

            The text is never going to be removed for sure because that takes action. But also no one is enforcing it either. I’d love to hear about anyone it’s been enforced against, if they exist.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              19 months ago

              If you think they’re not going to fight tooth and nail to enforce it in Texas, you don’t know Texas. It would probably have to go to SCOTUS.

              • @bostonbananarama
                link
                English
                19 months ago

                I just asked who has been barred from the ballot as a result. I’m aware of Republican candidates raising the issue in TX, only to be informed that it’s unconstitutional. To my knowledge, no one has ever been barred since that case. If you have different information please let me know.

                If someone were barred, they would sue in federal district court and immediately receive an injunction. Federal courts cannot ignore precedent from SCOTUS.

    • @UnderpantsWeevil
      link
      English
      19 months ago

      Texas huh? Yeah, that tracks.

      Actually we’re our own country and we get to do what we want.