@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 8 months agoskirting that linemander.xyzimagemessage-square15fedilinkarrow-up1658arrow-down13
arrow-up1655arrow-down1imageskirting that linemander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 8 months agomessage-square15fedilink
minus-squareEngywucklinkfedilinkEnglish16•edit-28 months agoAbstract+conclusions is the sweet spot. This makes me think that given some particular article, the only people that would ever read it in its entirety are its authors and (maybe) a couple reviewers.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish10•8 months agoMy preferred reading order: Abstract > conclusion > results > discussion / analysis > methods > background > introduction
minus-squareDharma CuriouslinkfedilinkEnglish1•8 months agoThis is the way. This is the way of light and goodness.
Abstracts are good enough for me
Abstract+conclusions is the sweet spot.
This makes me think that given some particular article, the only people that would ever read it in its entirety are its authors and (maybe) a couple reviewers.
My preferred reading order: Abstract > conclusion > results > discussion / analysis > methods > background > introduction
This is the way. This is the way of light and goodness.