@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 9 months agoPublic trustmander.xyzimagemessage-square217fedilinkarrow-up11.95Karrow-down139
arrow-up11.92Karrow-down1imagePublic trustmander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 9 months agomessage-square217fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish-5•9 months agoGreat, can you quantify how effective they were? So the issue is that if almost all infection happened not in public and cloth masks are marginally useful, what the point of wearing them in public if there is no measurable benefit?
minus-squareSatansMaggotyCumFartlinkEnglish5•9 months agoImagine still trying to start mask debates in 2024.
minus-squareSatansMaggotyCumFartlinkEnglish3•9 months agoIf you don’t know the difference between starting a debate and pointing out the ridiculousness of the topic then I guess that explains the obsession.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish-3•9 months agoYou read this far so… I think you seem to care
minus-squareSatansMaggotyCumFartlinkEnglish2•9 months agoI think trying to start mask debates in 2024 is ridiculous, but I’m sure I’ve said that already.
Great, can you quantify how effective they were? So the issue is that if almost all infection happened not in public and cloth masks are marginally useful, what the point of wearing them in public if there is no measurable benefit?
Imagine still trying to start mask debates in 2024.
And yet here you are…
If you don’t know the difference between starting a debate and pointing out the ridiculousness of the topic then I guess that explains the obsession.
You read this far so… I think you seem to care
I think trying to start mask debates in 2024 is ridiculous, but I’m sure I’ve said that already.