• @resetbypeer
    link
    433 months ago

    And that for being a non-public company.

    • @Blue_Morpho
      link
      333 months ago

      Non public should be more efficient from the labor cost savings of not having to file all the sec documents quarterly and legal costs of following public company regulations.

      • @yeahiknow3
        link
        41
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Not to mention that an obsession with increasing share price is massively distracting and self-defeating.

        • @fuckwit_mcbumcrumble
          link
          283 months ago

          Public companies focus on short term profit to keep share holders happy. Private companies can actually focus on long term profit, especially if it’s at the expense of some short term profit.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            43 months ago

            Or they can choose not to focus on profit at all. Probably most people with an ownership stake in Valve are fabulously rich now. Maybe they just want to focus on interesting R&D now.

            Theoretically there’s a benefit to a publicly traded company that since a lot of your financials are visible to everyone and people get to “vote” by buying and selling shares, there’s a sense in which you can get feedback on how well you’re running the company that you don’t get when it’s private. But, as Reddit’s “wall street bets” and “superstonk” subreddits show, a lot of investors are morons.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        83 months ago

        This isn’t totally true. Private companies can still have shareholders that demand info. Their aren’t the same level of regulations, but it’s not nothing.