Cross-posted from: https://feddit.de/post/10013170

The war in Ukraine is “existential for our Europe and for France”, Mr Macron said in the interview on France 2 and TF1.

“Do you think that the Poles, the Lithuanians, the Estonians, the Romanians and the Bulgarians could remain at peace for a second [in the event of a Russian victory in Ukraine]?” he asked. “If Russia wins this war, Europe’s credibility would be reduced to zero.”

  • @cosmicrookie
    link
    English
    18
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    So… west Ukraine up til Moscow and east Ukraine for the rest?

    Edit: apparently we need an /s

    • @nivenkos
      link
      English
      -158 months ago

      That isn’t realistic, and Russia has nuclear weapons too.

      The best bet is that the regime will be toppled in Russia with time, just like the USSR was.

      It’s better to lead by example with free institutions and free markets - the people of Russia will want freedom too.

      • @Maalus
        link
        English
        15
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        The US has nuclear weapons. Europe has nuclear weapons.

        Bullshit about “free institutions and free market”. That was the thought after the Soviet Union collapsed. And what do we have now? The exact opposite of what Russia “was supposed to be through open markets”.

        • @nivenkos
          link
          English
          -18 months ago

          Yeah, and they would use them if they had foreign armies pushing into their territory.

          But no efforts were made to really democratise and modernise Russia - they let oligarchs rise up from criminal gangs, etc., it’d have been better to have a more controlled process like Glasnost.

          • gian
            link
            fedilink
            English
            58 months ago

            Yeah, and they would use them if they had foreign armies pushing into their territory.

            I think that here the problem is not to invade Russia, but that Russia need to left Ukraine.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            38 months ago

            Yeah because Russia was not capitulated. They were a disfunctional, but sovereign country. You cannot dictate anything on them. You can lead by example or make suggestions, but ultimately it’s the will of the people that matters. In that regard the situation is rather similar to Germany post WW1. A people not yet ready for democracy and no one there to force them to. In Germany’s case it took the entire to be bombed to the ground, millions dead and being occupied by 4 not so emphatic countries.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              48 months ago

              I wouldn’t compare interwar Germany and post-USSR Russia this way. On the one hand, post-WWI Germany absolutely had dictates placed on them that were big enough and were meant to cripple the country. On the other hand, WWI wasn’t about democracy, but that the autocrats ruling Germany wanted colonial empires, like the autocrats ruling the Entente had.

              Yes, electing Hitler was not the correct path, but I guess it’s hard to see any path at all when English tourists laugh at the cheap prices at the café you work at while you wouldn’t be able to afford even one of them from your wages.

              Russia did not turn out better, since there was no real regime change after the end of the USSR. Putin was in the KGB. I’m sure most people who are in power now were in the elite in the USSR as well.

              It’s not “the people not yet ready for democracy”, it’s that the instruments of power had the same people manning them. If it was just the people, a lot of the US seems “not yet ready for democracy” with being hell-bent on electing a dictator.

              • lad
                link
                fedilink
                English
                18 months ago

                Russia did not turn out better, since there was no real regime change after the end of the USSR. Putin was in the KGB. I’m sure most people who are in power now were in the elite in the USSR as well.

                Actually Putin became president about ten years after the USSR collapsed, so there may have been a window of opportunity

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  28 months ago

                  Yeltsin was a highly placed party member as well before becoming president. You could say he was liberal, but so was Orbán during his first term.

                  • lad
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    18 months ago

                    Good point. I’m not sure if the first president could’ve been not a highly placed party member, though, that’d be more like a revolution

          • lad
            link
            fedilink
            English
            18 months ago

            I think there were some efforts, some may even worked. There were also efforts from the inside, but in the end those efforts were not enough, it seems

      • gian
        link
        fedilink
        English
        108 months ago

        That isn’t realistic, and Russia has nuclear weapons too.

        And so ? Should we let them to do whatever they want just because “we have nukes” ? I

        • @nivenkos
          link
          English
          -78 months ago

          No, Biden should send the US army as he has the ability to do so.

          But he is too weak to stand up to Putin, especially in an election year, so compromise is necessary.

            • @nivenkos
              link
              English
              -18 months ago

              Keeping the troops in Ukrainian territory wouldn’t start WW3. The UK already has troops there.

          • gian
            link
            fedilink
            English
            18 months ago

            No, Biden should send the US army as he has the ability to do so.

            US does not care about Ukraine, they only antogonize Russia. Then yeah, given what we have seen on the battlefield, if NATO will go boot on the ground Russia probably will have some serious problem (not that now they have not).

            But he is too weak to stand up to Putin, especially in an election year, so compromise is necessary.

            Maybe from a US point of view, but here we are discussing Europe.
            It is about time that Europe (and EU) begin to be what we say we are.

            I think that here Macron is damn right. Russia must not win this war because any concession we do to Russia now will be seen as “we can do whatever we want because in the end they fold”.
            Putin tried to take Ukraine exactly because EU and US did nothing when he took Crimea (if not talking).

            And this whatever the US say.