• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -22
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Science fiction of the 90s was the time to discuss philosophy. We didn’t come to a conclusion then. The future is now. A global low latency, highly available communications network is technologically inevitable. In our timeline, a rich narcissist has gathered enough support and competence around himself to start building that network. So now we have real, concrete questions that need answers: who should have access to that network, and who should decide?

    The way I see it, the options are (besides opening the network for everyone globally):

    • limit access to non-military purposes: practically impossible
    • limit access to the country of which Elon calls himself a citizen: what happens if he moves?
    • destroy the network: everyone is worse off
    • have the government take over control of the network: I don’t think we want this precedence

    Do you have another suggestion?

    • Pennomi
      link
      English
      18 months ago

      deleted by creator

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -28 months ago

        Then what are we even discussing? we’ve had orbital cameras for decades. These are just networked better and launched different?

        • Pennomi
          link
          English
          18 months ago

          This is a huge network (hundreds) of very low orbit satellites, making surveillance far closer to realtime, with more global coverage, with presumably a higher resolution. Since there are so many of them they’re also more resistant to anti-satellite weapons than traditional surveillance assets.

          Remember that the existing Keyhole satellites are basically the same build as the Hubble Space Telescope, meaning fewer, larger, more expensive satellites. This is a huge leap in capability.

          • @Zron
            link
            English
            28 months ago

            And what, you want to be able to use spy satellites to see your neighbor sunbathing in the backyard?

            These are military satellites, to look at military shit like what planes an enemy has on the runway and how many, where tanks are on a battlefield, if a convoy is getting ready to leave a depot and how many vehicles it has. Not to mention, what they are even capable of seeing is a matter of national security. If an enemy knows your satellite only has a certain resolution, they can figure out exactly what camouflage they need to defeat it. If they know how the infrared photography works, they can develop strategies to fake the number of functional vehicles they have. Not everyone in the whole world should know that shit. Otherwise the entire intelligence apparatus of the United States should just pack up and retire.

            We already have a global low latency communication network, it’s the thing I’m sending you this message on now. When we don’t need is a global, high quality, spy satellite network that everyone and their brother can use and learn the capabilities of.

            • Pennomi
              link
              English
              28 months ago

              Exactly my point. YOU don’t need a surveillance network. The US government DOES. And what do you know, this constellation was purchased by the US military, and is entirely for their exclusive use.

              This constellation is being purchased from SpaceX but is not going to be operated by SpaceX. I’m not sure why everyone thinks this is the same as Starlink as if it were a consumer product.

              • @db2
                link
                English
                08 months ago

                Because Elon is both smart and stupid enough to build in a personal backdoor.

                • Pennomi
                  link
                  English
                  18 months ago

                  Elon barely does anything at SpaceX these days. No doubt this deal is being run by Shotwell instead.