.

    • @kautau
      link
      128 months ago

      And micro for the future

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        28 months ago

        I’m too used to nano, switching for micro for a while I was constantly using nano key combos and making a mess of things.

        Stockholm syndrome from key combos lol

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            38 months ago

            It would just be a bit funny since sensible keybindings was one of the reasons I originally switched. Turns out I had already used nano too long for me to actually want that feature hah.

            • @kautau
              link
              78 months ago

              Haha very true, if micro was the default, many people coming from common GUI apps would be like “okay, ctrl z to undo” and “ctrl s to save” “wow, it actually worked”

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                48 months ago

                Absolutely. It would make sense as the default instead of nano (or vim of all things). Would help those who are just starting with Linux.

                • @kautau
                  link
                  38 months ago

                  Def! I sort of wish the RFC committee would push standards for smart cross-platform shortcuts. Of course people with muscle memory in a different standard should be able to change for their usage, but even GUI apps like vscode, sublime text, IntelliJ, etc could benefit from standardization there

                • @kautau
                  link
                  1
                  edit-2
                  8 months ago

                  True, but one keyboard shortcut doesn’t make for an easy transition. Unless nano is has implemented or is planning on implementing on ctrl o,z,f,y,q etc