.

  • @kautau
    link
    128 months ago

    And micro for the future

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      28 months ago

      I’m too used to nano, switching for micro for a while I was constantly using nano key combos and making a mess of things.

      Stockholm syndrome from key combos lol

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          38 months ago

          It would just be a bit funny since sensible keybindings was one of the reasons I originally switched. Turns out I had already used nano too long for me to actually want that feature hah.

          • @kautau
            link
            78 months ago

            Haha very true, if micro was the default, many people coming from common GUI apps would be like “okay, ctrl z to undo” and “ctrl s to save” “wow, it actually worked”

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              48 months ago

              Absolutely. It would make sense as the default instead of nano (or vim of all things). Would help those who are just starting with Linux.

              • @kautau
                link
                38 months ago

                Def! I sort of wish the RFC committee would push standards for smart cross-platform shortcuts. Of course people with muscle memory in a different standard should be able to change for their usage, but even GUI apps like vscode, sublime text, IntelliJ, etc could benefit from standardization there

              • @kautau
                link
                1
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                True, but one keyboard shortcut doesn’t make for an easy transition. Unless nano is has implemented or is planning on implementing on ctrl o,z,f,y,q etc